Archived Movable Type Content

November 29, 2004

Iorio developing ways to evict residents

We need lofts! We need condos! We need to move those unsightly poor brown people outa the way.

Mayor Pam Iorio's renewed interest in redeveloping the Central Park Village public housing complex has prompted the Tampa Housing Authority to scrap the $56 million plan it announced last month.

The housing agency tried this year to join with private investors and then the public sector to replace the crumbling 28-acre complex. After both attempts failed, the authority came up with its own plan to build a mixture of 590 rent-subsidized apartments and retail space.

That ended at the housing board meeting Friday.

Iorio sent a letter Thursday asking the authority to join the city and the county to develop a mixed-use complex.

The authority's plan, which called for nearly all low-income housing, could hamper the city's efforts to bring condominiums and lofts to neighboring areas, city officials have said. Iorio suggested taking six months to get proposals from developers.

Nice. We’ll evict the poor, tear down their homes, and replace them with something we will euphemistically refer to as “mixed use.” Of course, “mixed use” means that rich white people will use the front doors and poor brown people will use the servant’s entrances at the rear.

The two groups will then mix and interact, as the wealthy whites generously provide under the table minimum wage employment to the gracious former residents who are thankful to have finally been given the opportunity to become house niggers, a position most of them have been dreaming about for lo these many years.

It’s the perfect recipe for a vibrant, ethnically diverse neighborhood, lily white enclave in an area that has become prized by developers in recent years.

Yet, for some reason, the naysayers, those negative obstructionists who would stand in the way of a private developer making millions by displacing the powerless uh, hurt the poor by fighting progress are not on board with this mixed use trend.

Traditional bricks-and-mortar public housing for people living at or below poverty levels is slowly disappearing in the Tampa Bay area. The St. Petersburg Housing Authority, for example, is trying to sell 568 units of low-income housing - including James Park - the vast majority of which is public housing.

The potential sales come a few years after the agency saw more than 200 public housing apartments vanish when it rebuilt Jordan Park, another housing community.

Across the bay, the Tampa Housing Authority will have about 1,000 fewer public housing apartments when several projects under way are completed by 2006.

The gradual but steady dwindling of federally owned public housing reflects an ongoing shift by agencies away from owning low-income properties and toward buying mixed-income sites and moving residents into the private rental market with subsidized rent vouchers under the Section 8 program.
......

"The Housing Authority is positioning itself for the future," Syl Farrell, an agency spokesman, said in a statement. Darrell Irions, the St. Petersburg Housing Authority's executive director, and Debbie Johnson, his deputy, declined to be interviewed for this story.
......

But some low-income housing advocates offer a different, less sunny take. Public housing, they say, is a "precious resource" during a "huge" affordable housing crunch.

Moreover, they say, moving residents from public housing to Section 8, a program already under enormous pressure, puts residents at further risk. Families armed with such vouchers face a new set of challenges: looming threats of cuts by Congress; scraping up additional money for security deposits and paying utilities; and finding an affordable, available home to rent with the voucher in the first place.

"The federal government can take away a voucher just as easily as they give it," said Charles Elsesser, an attorney with Florida Legal Services, based in Miami. "But they can't take away a brick and mortar building. In selling the property they've given up an asset dedicated and targeted to the lowest income.

"Vouchers do not necessarily provide long-term housing for these people," said Elsesser, who serves on the board of the National Low Income Housing Coalition and the advisory board of the Florida Housing Coalition. "Housing authorities are not fairly calculating the benefits of public housing and the difficulty of using Section 8 vouchers."

* * *

Public housing, largely built after World War II, started disappearing in earnest in the 1990s when the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development began awarding multimillion-dollar HOPE VI grants to local housing authorities. The goal was to "eradicate severely distressed public housing" and break up concentrated poverty, populations and, in some instances, crime.

The St. Petersburg housing agency received a grant to demolish and rebuild the 446-unit Jordan Park. By the time the new Jordan Park was completed, it had 209 fewer units. The Housing Authority gave most of the displaced families Section 8 vouchers.
......

St. Petersburg housing officials say they plan to buy "mixed-income housing" with the money from any sales. But Elsesser, the attorney with Florida Legal Services, said such housing serves a different population.

"Mixed-income property tends to be for a different group of people, not the people living in public housing," Elsesser said. "We're losing the few units we have that are affordable for very, very low-income, disabled and unemployed families."

HUD classifies families earning no more than 50 percent of the area median income as "very low income." That's $25,600 or less for a Tampa Bay area family of four. Public housing residents and Section 8 recipients generally pay 30 percent of their adjusted gross income for rent. In some cases, such as McGowan's, they pay zero.

While public housing has seen its share of problems over the decades, Section 8 isn't perfect, housing advocates say.

Last year, the nation's more than 3,000 housing authorities, which Elsesser said are caught between shrinking federal budgets and people who desperately need affordable housing, didn't receive enough government funds to subsidize their Section 8 vouchers.

"Right now there's a battle in Congress as to whether to fully fund the vouchers that exist for next year," Elsesser said. "Whether or not the housing authorities will continue to have these vouchers in the future is totally up for grabs.

"I sympathize with the housing authorities' position. The federal government and HUD have been waging a war on housing authorities and public housing."

At the residential level, there are other problems as well, he said. For senior citizens and others who need smaller apartments, the Section 8 program tends to work well, Elsesser and others said.

But for larger families, such as McGowan and her four children, finding four- or five-bedroom units in the private market is impossible because developers no longer build them. Also, families can lose their vouchers if they don't find a place to rent within a period of time that varies by agency. And landlords aren't obligated to renew a Section 8 tenant's lease.

In Tampa, Leroy Moore, the Housing Authority's chief development officer, said the agency isn't serving fewer people.

In one redevelopment project alone, the agency estimates a loss of 900 public housing units once Ponce de Leon and College Hill complexes - originally a total of 1,300 units - are finished being rebuilt next year with a HOPE VI grant.

The new community, renamed Belmont Heights Estates, will contain 850 units, 399 of them public housing. The other apartments will be market rate, Section 8 and subsidized by state tax credits, Moore said.

"The exact same tenants who qualify for public housing qualify for Section 8," said Moore, adding that responsibility for creating affordable housing lies with private developers, local government as well as housing authorities. "We're serving the same population. We're not serving fewer people."

In Tampa, 8,400 families are on the housing agency's waiting list for Section 8 and public housing, mostly for the latter. More than 1,700 families fill the St. Petersburg Housing Authority's waiting list for Section 8 housing, and the list is closed.

So, if we sell or demolish the actual dwelling units that are now housing the poor, and evict those folks into the Section 8 program, well, when that mean old Congress takes away the vouchers, the poor will no longer be our problem. We’ll eliminate the voucher list, and with it the waiting list, and our affordable housing crisis will be solved.

Oh, and we can have some swell parties in those new Downtown/Ybor condos!

Posted by Norwood at November 29, 2004 02:03 PM
Comments